Comp Feature Extractor

Feature-Detection Safety Net ยท Sales Comparison Approach
Detection aid only. This tool reports what appears in the MLS data, remarks, and photos. It cannot confirm a feature is absent โ€” a shop can sit off-frame. The appraiser owns the final call.

13 Rosewood ๐Ÿ“„ Workfile PDF

API usage this job: ~$1.23 (batch pricing)
This page expires Sep 27, 2026 โ€” download the workfile PDF for the permanent record.
โš  Subject photos extracted at low resolution (median 532px wide) โ€” quality/condition impressions may be less reliable. A higher-resolution photo-pages export would improve them.
Cards Side-by-side Commentary ReviseManage comps

Relative Quality & Condition ADVISORY (beta) โ€” appraiser assigns ratings

Condition

The subject, 2913 Joanna Drive, 104 Country Club Road, and 297 Southwick Cove form the top tier of the set, each presenting as well-maintained with rolling cosmetic updates (refreshed kitchens, updated or partially updated baths, newer flooring) layered onto original 1980s-90s construction, with no deferred maintenance visible in photos. 867 Heather sits a modest step below this group โ€” its recent flooring, paint, and water-filtration updates are offset by kitchen and bath finishes that remain entirely original and dated. 954 Joseph Dr is a further step below, with retained laminate-style counters, a dated original primary bath (jetted tub, glass block window), and a seller-offered painting allowance signaling some anticipated cosmetic work. 13 Sedgefield Drive is the clear outlier at the bottom, with original, unupdated kitchen and bath finishes throughout and no material cosmetic refresh evident, consistent with a full condition step below the subject and most of the set.

Quality

The comp set is quality-homogeneous. The subject and every comparable are consistent with Q4 builder-grade, brick-veneer production construction, with only minor decorative touches (vaulted ceilings, brick fireplaces, wainscoting, a built-in wet bar, wrought-iron porch rail) that add modest character without elevating any property beyond stock/production grade. No material quality gaps were identified across the set; any differences are at the margin and do not warrant a distinct ranking tier.

Versus subject

Against the subject (Q4 quality, condition consistent with well-maintained C3 with updated kitchen and updated baths), most of the set tracks closely: 2913 Joanna Drive, 104 Country Club Road, and 297 Southwick Cove all present similarly on both quality and condition, though Joanna Drive's baths remain unupdated versus the subject's updated baths, a difference not large enough to move its overall condition standing. 867 Heather is only slightly behind the subject in condition, largely because its kitchen and baths remain fully original where the subject's are updated, though the gap is modest given Heather's other recent updates. 954 Joseph Dr and especially 13 Sedgefield Drive are the two comparables that read as clearly inferior to the subject in condition, both retaining original, dated kitchen and bath finishes the subject has already had refreshed. Quality is essentially uniform across the entire set relative to the subject, with no comparable standing out as superior or inferior on that dimension.

Notable gaps

Confidence notes

CategorySubject property SUBJECT
appraiser inspection photos
2913 Joanna Drive
MLS # 25049478
954 Joseph Dr
MLS # 26007620
104 Country Club Road
MLS # 26011650
297 Southwick Cove
MLS # 26020040
13 Sedgefield Drive
MLS # 26026134
867 Heather
MLS # 26027646
Q/C impression
beta
MEDIUM Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C3K: updatedB: not updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C3-to-C4K: updatedB: not updatedHIGH Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedHIGH Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C4K: not updatedB: not updatedHIGH Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not updated
Vs. subject
beta
โ€”Q similarC similar
Both present as Q4 builder-grade construction with a similarly well-maintained, updated-kitchen condition profile, though Joanna Drive's baths remain unupdated versus the subject's updated baths without shifting its overall condition standing.
Q similarC inferior
Joseph Dr retains laminate-style counters and a dated original primary bath, and the listing offers a painting allowance, placing its condition moderately below the subject's updated kitchen/baths and fresher overall presentation.
Q similarC similar
Both show extensive, recent kitchen and bath cosmetic updates (new countertops, repainted cabinetry, updated fixtures) over original builder-grade construction, tracking closely with the subject.
Q similarC similar
Southwick Cove shows a comparably updated kitchen and primary bath, though its secondary bath retains original 1980s tile; overall condition still tracks with the subject's mixed-update profile.
Q similarC inferior
Sedgefield Drive's kitchen and both baths remain original and dated with no evidence of updating, a clear step below the subject's updated kitchen and baths.
Q similarC similar
Heather shows recent flooring, paint, and mechanical updates but an entirely original, unupdated kitchen and baths versus the subject's updated ones; the resulting condition gap is modest enough to remain within a similar overall impression.
Detached outbuildingsโ€”

Small structure with a peaked/shed roofline visible at the right edge of the rear yard, partially obscured by vegetation

Structure with reddish roofline visible beyond the rear fence line

โ€”

Storage shed (wood-toned siding, double doors) in rear yard

Green gable-roofed structure visible beyond side/rear fence

Freestanding metal storage shed with gambrel (barn-style) roof, approx. 8-10 ft wide, located in rear yard

โ€”

Detached two-car garage, described as 'oversized' with room for vehicles, storage, or a workshop

Photo-only findings

Enclosed sunroom/family room addition with brick interior walls and continuous window wall

Large rear concrete patio with seating area

Decorative stamped/paver walkway along side yard

Decorative round columns separating living and dining areas

โ€”โ€”

Small wood-framed lean-to/pergola-style structure attached to the rear fence line, adjacent to the covered patio

Built-in wood wall shelving unit in a flex/storage room

Covered brick breezeway/walkway connecting sections of the rear deck area

Fabric shade sail mounted between rooflines over the rear deck

Pools & site improvementsโ€”

Wood deck at rear of home

Extensive stone/paver patio with rock garden landscaping and pathways

In-ground pool (kidney/free-form shape) with concrete/aggregate deck and fenced enclosure

Newer pool pump (no date given)

Covered brick patio with low brick seat wall

โ€”โ€”

Whirlpool/Hot Tub/Spa checkbox (interior fixture)

Site & viewโ€”

Heavily wooded rear lot providing privacy buffer

โ€”

Proximity to Tucker Creek Trail and neighborhood park

โ€”โ€”

Rear yard backs toward a large open mowed field/greenspace beyond the fence line

Dated renovationsโ€”

New roof

Roof โ€” stated as approximately two years old at time of listing

Roof replaced 2021

HVAC replaced 2020

Water heater replaced 2023

โ€”โ€”

Roof approximately 4 years old

Whole-house water filtration system installed 2023

Review required

No appraiser notes were provided at all; all quality/condition and improvement impressions rely solely on photo review and should be confirmed against the appraiser's actual inspection findings.

Photo 4 shows a carport/roof structure whose attachment to the main dwelling is not entirely clear from the angle shown; confirm whether this is an attached or detached structure.

Photo 5 shows a structure partially visible beyond the rear wood fence line that may belong to a neighboring property; cannot be confirmed as a subject-property improvement.

Verify actual extent of yard fencing (partially vs. fully fenced) given apparent contradiction between structured field and photos

Confirm ownership/boundary of structure(s) visible near or beyond the rear fence line in Photos 30 and 32

Confirm condition and finishes of the second full bathroom, not clearly documented in the photo set

Baths_status is based solely on the primary bath (2 photos); the second full bath noted in structured fields was not pictured and its condition/updates could not be assessed.

Kitchen assessed from a single photo; full extent of countertop material, cabinet interior condition, and flooring condition beyond the visible frame could not be verified.

No photographs of the roof, gutters, or water heater were provided to corroborate the Public Remarks' claims of recent roof and water heater replacement.

Rooflines/structures visible over the rear fence line in Photos 3 and 4 appear to belong to neighboring properties, not the subject; flagged at LOW confidence due to this ambiguity and excluded from outbuilding findings.

Garage interior not photographed; cannot verify condition/finish or confirm two-car garage claim visually.

Ambiguous ownership of the green gable-roofed structure visible beyond the rear fence โ€” may belong to neighboring property.

Exact dimensions/construction of the rear-yard storage shed could not be confirmed from available photo angles.

Confirm whether the home has an enclosed garage or only the 'Parking Pads/Two Car' concrete pad noted in structured fields โ€” no garage door or garage interior photos were provided, and front elevation photos (1-3) show no garage door

Verify the purpose and ownership of the wood lean-to/pergola-style structure attached to the rear fence (Photos 29-30), as it is undocumented in remarks or structured fields

Full exterior condition (roof, siding, garage, rear yard) could not be assessed due to lack of photos

Interior clutter and dim lighting limit certainty on cabinet, counter, and flooring condition in kitchen and bedrooms

Clarify whether the structured 'Whirlpool/Hot Tub/Spa' field refers to a jetted tub, a separate spa/hot tub, or is simply describing the soaking tub shown in photos.

Confirm actual dimensions of the detached garage to verify the 'oversized' description in remarks.

Confirm ownership/boundary of the large open field visible beyond the rear fence line in aerial photos.

Contradictionsโ€”

Structured Field lists 'Partially Fenced,' but backyard photos (28-32) show what appears to be a continuous wood privacy fence enclosing the entire visible rear yard perimeter.

โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Structured field lists 'Whirlpool/Hot Tub/Spa' but bathroom photos (25, 28) show a plain soaking/garden tub with no visible jets, suggesting the field may simply be referencing the soaking tub described in remarks rather than a true whirlpool or separate spa.

Public remarks describe the detached garage as 'oversized,' but photos (4, 37, 38) show what appears to be a standard-dimension two-car garage; size should be confirmed against actual measurements.

โ† all jobs