Comp Feature Extractor
Feature-Detection Safety Net · Sales Comparison Approach
75 Summit Road presents best, showing essentially new-construction condition with unworn, updated finishes throughout. A step behind, 214 Carroll Rd Road and 27 Majestic Valley present similarly to each other, each well maintained with recent targeted updates (kitchen and primary bath remodeling at 214 Carroll Rd Road; near-new appliances, HVAC, and roof at 27 Majestic Valley). The subject, 30 Sellers Rd, and 216 Carroll Road form a middle tier, all presenting as well-kept but with original, non-updated kitchen and bath finishes. 24 Sandlewood Road sits a step below this group due to visible cracking in the stained concrete floor finish that appears to continue into the wall/baseboard, a condition flag warranting field verification. 27 Stevenson Lane appears lowest, based only on an exterior photo showing overgrown vegetation at the foundation; this call rests on LOW confidence given the near-total absence of interior documentation.
75 Summit Road edges out the rest of the set with craftsman-level detailing (timber-frame accents, custom cabinetry), though the margin over the next group is modest. 214 Carroll Rd Road, 27 Majestic Valley, 24 Sandlewood Road, and the subject present similarly to one another, all reflecting well-finished, above-builder-grade original construction with crown molding, tray/vaulted ceilings, and brick exteriors — quality gaps within this group are minor. 30 Sellers Rd trails slightly, though this is uncertain given only a single exterior photo was available (LOW confidence). 216 Carroll Road is a step below the main cluster, as standard vinyl windows and a conventional roofline keep it closer to builder grade despite otherwise nice detailing. 27 Stevenson Lane appears lowest, consistent with a more standard stock/builder-grade design, but this too rests on a single exterior photo and LOW confidence.
The subject presents as a well-finished, above-builder-grade home (stone/brick exterior, tray ceilings, built-ins) with kitchen and bath finishes that appear original to construction rather than later-updated, placing it in the middle of both the quality and condition rankings for this set. It compares closely in quality to 214 Carroll Rd Road, 27 Majestic Valley, and 24 Sandlewood Road, and in condition to 30 Sellers Rd and 216 Carroll Road, while comps with recent kitchen/bath updates or near-new construction (214 Carroll Rd Road, 27 Majestic Valley, 75 Summit Road) show better condition than the subject's original, unupdated finish level.
| Category | Subject property SUBJECT appraiser inspection photos | 214 Carroll Rd Road MLS # 25017419 | 27 Majestic Valley MLS # 25026622 | 30 Sellers Rd MLS # 25039051 | 24 Sandlewood Road MLS # 25044781 | 75 Summit Road MLS # 26000793 | 27 Stevenson Lane MLS # 26008651 | 216 Carroll Road MLS # 26013760 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q/C impression beta |
MEDIUM Q3 / C3K: not updatedB: not updated | HIGH Q3 / C2-to-C3K: updatedB: updated | HIGH Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: updatedB: not updated | LOW Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: not observedB: not observed | HIGH Q3 / C3-to-C4K: not updatedB: not updated | HIGH Q3 / C3K: updatedB: updated | LOW Q4 / C3K: not observedB: not observed | HIGH Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not updated |
| Vs. subject beta |
— | Q similarC superior Similar above-builder-grade brick construction, but this comparable's updated kitchen and remodeled primary bath give it a fresher condition than the subject's original, unupdated finishes. | Q similarC superior Comparable quality level is similar, but near-new appliances, HVAC, and roof (per remarks) give this comparable an edge in condition over the subject's original, well-kept but unupdated finishes. | Q unclearC unclear Only a single exterior photo is available with no interior views, so quality and condition relative to the subject cannot be confidently assessed (LOW confidence). | Q similarC inferior Quality level is comparable, but visible cracking in the concrete floor finish introduces a condition concern not present in the subject, pending field verification. | Q similarC superior Quality is close to the subject with only a slight edge from custom craftsman detailing; condition is notably better given the property's 2022 construction and like-new, updated finishes versus the subject's original unupdated kitchen/baths. | Q unclearC unclear Assessment is based on a single exterior photo with no interior documentation and LOW confidence, so a reliable comparison to the subject's quality or condition cannot be made. | Q inferiorC similar Standard vinyl windows and a conventional roofline make this comparable's original construction a step below the subject's more elevated detailing, while both properties show similar well-maintained, non-updated kitchen/bath condition. |
| Detached outbuildings | Detached metal pole barn/shop with attached open lean-to carport Large detached shop/flex building interior with steel truss ceiling and rough-in rooms | Detached shop/pole building Outside Storage Area | Detached insulated shop, approximately 40' x 60', metal/stone-accent construction with two garage bay doors (one oversized) and man door | Possible small outbuilding or structure with reddish/rust-colored roof visible in the far right background of the photo | Detached brick shop with finished living quarters (bedroom, small office, full bath, epoxy floors, heated/cooled) Small detached storage outbuilding/shed Large covered carport/RV-boat parking area attached to shop Walk-in storm shelter/safe room within the shop | Detached shop with car lift, epoxy flooring, mini-split HVAC, and workbench/storage Lean-to carport attached to the detached shop Small storage shed at rear of wooded lot | — | Detached shop building — large pole-barn style metal structure with concrete floor, electrical panel, built-in workbenches/shelving, and roll-up garage door; per floor plan approx. 30'8"x40'8" plus an attached 15'1"x9'1" room and 15'7"x9'7" covered patio Additional small outbuilding(s)/sheds adjacent to the main shop Detached carport/garage structure near driveway, separate from the shop |
| Photo-only findings | Covered rear patio/porch with ceiling fan | Small red outbuilding visible in wooded background Additional structure/roofline beyond fence line | Outdoor cooking/grill station area on covered patio (pellet smoker, offset smoker, gas grill, griddle) Farm pond near rear tree line | Covered full-width front porch with wood support posts on brick piers | Possible structure (play equipment) visible beyond rear fence line in aerial photo | Covered rear patio with tongue-and-groove wood ceiling, ceiling fan, recessed lighting, and brick paver border | Full-width covered front porch | Corner whirlpool/jetted garden tub in primary bathroom |
| Pools & site improvements | — | In-ground storm cellar / tornado shelter | In-ground gunite/vinyl-liner pool with tanning ledge, water feature/waterfall, and slide New pool liner Extensive stamped/finished concrete pool deck and stone patio steps | — | In-ground saltwater pool with custom tile finish, heated, and tanning ledge Built-in raised spa/hot tub integrated with the pool Covered back patio Stacked-stone retaining wall/hardscape border around pool patio Gated entrance with brick columns at driveway Perimeter fencing: 8' wood privacy fence (rear) and iron/metal fence (front) | — | — | Above-ground pool with winter cover Pool safety fencing surrounding the above-ground pool |
| Site & view | Heavily wooded, spacious rear/side yard suggesting larger-than-typical lot | 4.00-acre lot (174,240 sq. ft.) Pond on the property | 3.00-acre lot described as secluded but convenient, wooded/pastoral surroundings Tornado shelter in garage Covered back porch overlooking acreage/pool area Pond visible in rear/side acreage view | 3.73 acres of land | 1.08-acre lot supporting pool, shop, and additional structures Spring-fed brook with wood footbridge crossing rear portion of the lot Private, gated cul-de-sac setting | 1.75± acre sloped, wooded lot | 10-acre lot, described as level, wooded, and partially cleared | Approximately 4 acres of rural land Wooded rear/side buffer providing privacy/seclusion |
| Dated renovations | — | — | Roof | — | — | — | — | — |
| Review required | Clarify whether the large unfinished interior space in Photos 20, 21, and 23 is the same structure as the pole barn in Photo 6 or a separate building, and confirm its finished/contributory status for valuation purposes. Rough-plumbed half bath in the outbuilding (Photo 22) appears incomplete (exposed connections, unfinished walls) — confirm completion status before assigning contributory value. | Foundation type discrepancy (Slab per MLS vs. apparent block/crawlspace skirting visible in Photo 2) should be field-verified. Ownership of structures visible in the background of Photos 3 and 6 (possible red shed and brick roofline near the fence line) should be confirmed as belonging to the subject parcel and not a neighboring property. Storm cellar/tornado shelter's structural condition and functionality were not visible in photos and should be inspected. The claimed 'well over 100K' in remodeling/updates 'two years ago' per Public Remarks could not be corroborated with specific dates or documentation; appraiser should confirm actual scope and timing of updates for effective age purposes. | Ownership/boundary of the pond visible in aerial photos (Photo 1, 12, 13) relative to the 3-acre subject parcel should be confirmed against a plat or survey. No interior photos of the garage were provided to verify the stated tornado shelter. Bathroom modernization status could not be fully confirmed as remodeled vs. original; appraiser should confirm counter/vanity age during inspection. | Interior condition and quality (kitchen, baths, flooring, systems) cannot be assessed due to complete absence of interior photos — recommend obtaining additional listing photos or a property visit. Ownership and nature of the small reddish-roofed structure visible in the background of Photo 1 should be confirmed — it may be located on a neighboring parcel. | Hairline crack in concrete floor finish appears to extend up the wall/baseboard in the dining area (Photo 11), with related floor cracking visible in the living room and foyer (Photos 6, 10) — recommend inspection to rule out slab or foundation movement. Ambiguous structure visible beyond the rear fence line in aerial Photo 49 — confirm whether it lies within the subject property boundary. Shop/ADU living quarters bathroom and bedroom finish condition are only partially visible in photos — recommend field verification to support effective age and quality conclusions. | Owner/Agent Disclosure notes 'Listing Agent/Broker is related to seller/owner with ownership interest' - verify arm's-length nature of this sale before use as a comparable Confirm whether the car lift and shop equipment (tool chests, crane, tire machine) convey with sale as stated in remarks, since personal property inclusions can affect price comparability Verify property line/ownership of the rear storage shed and shop carport relative to subject boundary, though both appear to sit on the same parcel as the shop | Interior condition and quality (kitchen, baths, flooring, etc.) could not be observed due to lack of interior photos — appraiser should verify via other means. Verify actual exterior material (wood vs. vinyl) given discrepancy between structured field and photo. Confirm covered front porch details (size, flooring material, structural soundness) as it is undocumented in structured fields or remarks. | Verify whether the structure in Photo 1 near the driveway is an enclosed detached garage or an open carport, and reconcile against the structured 'Garage, Two Car, Detached' field. Confirm the count and dimensions of the additional outbuilding(s) behind the main shop — public remarks reference one, but Photo 38 appears to show two small joined shed structures. Hairline crack visible in the shop's concrete slab floor (Photo 39); appears cosmetic/confined to the accessory structure but should be confirmed as non-structural. |
| Contradictions | — | Structured field lists foundation as 'Slab,' but Photo 2 shows a concrete block foundation/skirting wall with vent-like openings beneath the rear deck area, which is more consistent with a crawlspace foundation; foundation type should be field-verified. Public Remarks state the home was built in 2005 with 1,992 sq. ft., while structured fields list Year Built 2006 and Approx. SQFT 1,994 — minor, likely immaterial discrepancies. | — | — | — | — | Structured EXTERIOR field states 'Wood' but the siding visible in Photo 1 appears consistent with vinyl siding, not wood — possible data entry error or mismatch. | — |