Comp Feature Extractor

Feature-Detection Safety Net ยท Sales Comparison Approach
Detection aid only. This tool reports what appears in the MLS data, remarks, and photos. It cannot confirm a feature is absent โ€” a shop can sit off-frame. The appraiser owns the final call.

4535 Fugitt ๐Ÿ“„ Workfile PDF

API usage this job: ~$1.54 (batch pricing)
This page expires Sep 30, 2026 โ€” download the workfile PDF for the permanent record.
Cards Side-by-side Commentary ReviseManage comps

Relative Quality & Condition ADVISORY (beta) โ€” appraiser assigns ratings

Condition

All seven properties land on essentially the same C3 (well-maintained, no deferred maintenance) rung, so this is a tightly bunched group rather than a clear ladder. Within that band, 1210 Calloway Drive sits at the strong end, backed by the most recently dated component work (2023 roof, 2020 HVAC, 2022 kitchen repaint and partial primary-bath remodel). The subject, 1810 Penny, 5240 Browning Drive, 4610 Fugitt Street, and 1260 Champions Drive form the broad middle of the band, each well-presented but each retaining at least one untouched original space (kitchen and/or a bath). 1660 Chicot Drive sits at the soft edge of the group: its kitchen and secondary bath are wholly original and its rear deck shows visible weathering, offset only by a remodeled primary bath.

Quality

4610 Fugitt Street reads as the most elevated property in the set, with two-story massing, dormers, and staircase millwork that push it toward the upper end of a Q3-to-Q4 impression. 1210 Calloway Drive, 1660 Chicot Drive, and 1260 Champions Drive form a middle cluster, also anchored Q3-to-Q4 on the strength of crown molding, tray ceilings, and (at Chicot) an arched brick porch, though their kitchen and bath cabinetry read as standard builder stock. 1810 Penny, 5240 Browning Drive, and the subject sit at the base of the range, each consistent with a straightforward Q4 production-built impression. Overall the quality spread across the set is modest โ€” roughly a half-step from top to bottom โ€” so this is a fairly homogeneous comp set on the quality axis.

Versus subject

The subject is a single-story Q4 production ranch with a fully original, unmodified kitchen and both baths, yet still lands at a C3 condition impression on the strength of a recent roof, new HVAC, and new living/dining flooring. Most comparables carry at least a partial kitchen or bath update that the subject lacks, but because several of those updates are cosmetic overlays on original cabinetry (granite over original boxes, repainted stock cabinets, a single remodeled bath alongside an untouched one), the group's overall condition still converges on the same C3 band as the subject. On quality, the subject sits with 1810 Penny and 5240 Browning Drive at the lower end of a narrow range, while 1210 Calloway Drive, 1660 Chicot Drive, and 1260 Champions Drive show slightly more elevated trim packages, and 4610 Fugitt Street stands out as the most architecturally elevated property in the set.

Notable gaps

Confidence notes

Category4535 FUGITT Street SUBJECT
MLS # 26034861
1810 Penny
MLS # 25025915
5240 Browning Drive
MLS # 25029132
1210 Calloway Drive
MLS # 25045267
1660 Chicot Drive
MLS # 26009717
4610 Fugitt St
MLS # 26023982
1260 Champions Drive
MLS # 26026948
Q/C impression
beta
MEDIUM Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not updatedHIGH Q4 / C3K: updatedB: not updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedMEDIUM Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedMEDIUM Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: remodeledHIGH Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updatedHIGH Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: updatedB: updated
Vs. subject
beta
โ€”Q similarC similar
Both are Q4 brick production homes with comparable trim; 1810 Penny's granite kitchen counters mirror the same 'partial update over original cabinetry' pattern seen elsewhere, and its baths remain original like the subject's, so both land at the same C3 impression.
Q similarC similar
Both read as Q4 construction; 5240 Browning Drive's remodeled primary-suite shower is a genuine upgrade the subject's fully original baths lack, but its secondary bath and kitchen cabinetry remain original, so the overall condition band still matches the subject's โ€” this call carries some hedge given only MEDIUM confidence on this comp.
Q similarC similar
1210 Calloway Drive's slightly elevated millwork places it marginally above the subject's base Q4 impression, but the gap is small; its more granular, recently dated updates (2023 roof, 2020 HVAC, 2022 kitchen/bath work) are offset by a still-original primary vanity and a fully original secondary bath, landing condition at parity with the subject โ€” MEDIUM confidence tempers this comparison.
Q similarC similar
1660 Chicot Drive's original kitchen matches the subject's own unmodified kitchen, while its remodeled primary bath is offset by a dated, un-updated secondary bath and some deck weathering, so condition lands at the same C3 level as the subject; MEDIUM confidence on this comp warrants some caution.
Q superiorC similar
4610 Fugitt Street's two-story design, dormers, and staircase millwork represent a genuine step up in original construction quality over the subject's single-story production ranch; its updated kitchen counters/backsplash and refreshed bath counters give it slightly fresher finishes, but the overall condition impression still sits in the same C3 band as the subject's own recently updated HVAC/roof/flooring.
Q similarC similar
1260 Champions Drive's fireplace millwork and crown molding are modestly above base builder grade, similar to the subject's own above-base trim package; its comprehensive recent paint refresh and granite counters over original cabinetry parallel the subject's recent HVAC/roof/flooring work, keeping both in the same C3 condition band.
Detached outbuildingsโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Storage building/shed in backyard

Possible greenhouse-type structure visible beyond rear fence line

5x7 storage building (shed)

Chicken coop/run

Additional gray/metal shed-like structure at rear of yard

Metal storage shed

Photo-only findings

Covered rear patio with roof overhang and support columns

โ€”

Primary bath corner tub with visible jet fixtures (whirlpool-style)

Crown molding and tray ceilings throughout main living/dining areas

Wall-mounted supplemental AC/condensing unit on garage exterior wall

โ€”โ€”
Pools & site improvementsโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Rear wood deck

Site & viewโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Large lot / sizeable fenced backyard

Oversized fully fenced backyard

Dated renovations

New HVAC system installed

Roof replacement

โ€”โ€”

Roof (October 2023)

HVAC (2020)

All House surge protector (2022)

Kitchen cabinets repainted (2022)

Primary bath remodeled (2022)

Microwave (approx. 2 years old)

โ€”

Architectural roof new in 2018

New hot water tank 2022

โ€”
Review required

Confirm the covered rear patio (visible in Photos 38-39) with the listing agent, including size and construction, since it is undocumented in structured fields or remarks.

Verify kitchen and bath modernization status via a walk-through or additional close-up photos, as the current photo set shows original-appearing 2002 finishes despite the stated recent HVAC and roof updates.

Confirm whether the 'Whirlpool/Hot Tub/Spa' structured field refers only to the primary bath's jetted tub (as photos suggest) or an additional exterior spa not shown in photos.

Hairline crack visible in garage floor slab beneath new epoxy coating (Photo 46) โ€” recommend verifying whether this is cosmetic slab shrinkage or indicative of a structural/settlement issue

Baths_status is mixed (primary remodeled vs. secondary not updated) โ€” appraiser should independently verify condition of secondary bath during inspection since dominant-state call was a judgment blend

Verify actual scope of the 2022 'primary bath remodeled' claim given the retained original oak vanity โ€” appraiser should confirm whether this was a full or partial remodel for accurate condition rating.

Confirm condition/vintage of the secondary full bath (Photo 26), which appears original/dated (sliding glass shower door, oak vanity) and was not mentioned among the stand-out updated features.

Confirm whether the greenhouse-type structure visible in Photos 33-34 belongs to the subject property or a neighboring parcel, and if it belongs to subject, obtain size/condition detail.

Verify the function of the wall-mounted unit on the garage exterior (Photo 40) โ€” supplemental cooling equipment not referenced in structured fields or remarks.

Bath condition rating split between remodeled primary suite and not-updated hall bath should be reviewed by appraiser for final UAD determination.

Verify whether all bathrooms received updated countertops as stated, given Photo 32 appears to show an unupdated vanity/counter.

Confirm ownership/boundary of the additional gray/metal shed-like structure visible at the rear of the yard (Photos 34, 39) โ€” may belong to subject or a neighboring property.

Garage interior condition not visible in any photo and should be verified for grid purposes.

Confirm exact dimensions and construction/material grade of the rear metal shed for accurate contributory value, as it is not documented in structured fields or remarks.

Confirm specific completion dates for the cited 'recent' interior paint, landscaping, and window tinting (remarks state only 'within the last year') to properly support effective age determination.

Verify that the metal shed sits fully within the subject's own fenced lot rather than a shared or adjacent property line, though photo evidence suggests it is within the subject's fence line.

Contradictionsโ€”

Structured field 'INTERIORS' lists 'Whirlpool/Hot Tub/Spa,' which could suggest a standalone spa or hot tub; Photo 30 shows this is actually a built-in jetted garden tub within the primary bathroom, not an exterior spa/hot tub amenity.

โ€”

Public/Agent remarks state the primary bath was 'remodeled' in 2022, but Photos 20-21 show the primary vanity is original oak-stained cabinetry with a basic solid-surface top, suggesting the remodel was limited to the shower/tile area rather than a full bath remodel.

โ€”

Public remarks state 'New countertops and fixtures in all the bathrooms,' but Photo 32 shows an older-style stained wood vanity with a plain, non-granite countertop that does not match the granite/quartz updates seen in the primary and half baths.

Structured 'EXT. FEATURES' field lists only 'Patio,' but Public Remarks and photos (37, 41) confirm a separate rear wood deck exists, which is not distinctly captured in the structured data.

โ† all jobs