Comp Feature Extractor

Feature-Detection Safety Net ยท Sales Comparison Approach
Detection aid only. This tool reports what appears in the MLS data, remarks, and photos. It cannot confirm a feature is absent โ€” a shop can sit off-frame. The appraiser owns the final call.

38 Tom Jones Rd ๐Ÿ“„ Workfile PDF

API usage this job: ~$1.14 (batch pricing)
This page expires Oct 08, 2026 โ€” download the workfile PDF for the permanent record.
โš  Subject photos extracted at low resolution (median 532px wide) โ€” quality/condition impressions may be less reliable. A higher-resolution photo-pages export would improve them.
Cards Side-by-side Commentary ReviseManage comps

Relative Quality & Condition ADVISORY (beta) โ€” appraiser assigns ratings

Condition

Best condition is a close pairing of 493 AR-287 Highway and 1225 Stony Point Road, both presenting as essentially like-new with no wear (new/near-new construction, one with post-construction kitchen/bath updates, the other pristine as originally built). 10 Hammond Drive follows closely, described as well-maintained with clean, unworn finishes, just behind the top pair. The subject sits in a similar tier, its remodeled primary bath and updated kitchen keeping it competitive with 10 Hammond Drive. A step below are 104 Cove Chapel Road and 6907 Hwy 9, both well-maintained but with original, un-updated kitchen and bath finishes rather than showing renovation. 916 Caney Valley Drive brings up the rear, presenting as clean but entirely un-updated, and that placement is based on sparse interior photo coverage, so it should be treated as a softer call.

Quality

The set is largely homogeneous on quality, with most properties - 916 Caney Valley Drive, 493 AR-287 Highway, 1225 Stony Point Road, 6907 Hwy 9, and the subject - anchored at the same stock/builder-grade manufactured or modular level, differing mainly in trim/millwork flourishes rather than true construction-quality tier. 10 Hammond Drive edges slightly ahead of this group due to upgraded modular specifications (2x6 walls, granite counters, crown molding, tiled walk-in shower). 104 Cove Chapel Road trails the pack modestly, described as a more plain/economy-grade finish package with minimal ornamentation despite its open layout and island.

Versus subject

On quality, the subject sits with the majority of the comparables at a stock manufactured/modular grade, essentially matching 916 Caney Valley Drive, 493 AR-287 Highway, 1225 Stony Point Road, and 6907 Hwy 9; 10 Hammond Drive shows a modest edge from upgraded specifications, and 104 Cove Chapel Road trends toward a more basic finish level. On condition, the subject's updated kitchen and remodeled primary bath place it in the upper-middle of the set - behind the near-new presentations of 493 AR-287 Highway and 1225 Stony Point Road, roughly level with 10 Hammond Drive, and ahead of 104 Cove Chapel Road, 6907 Hwy 9, and especially 916 Caney Valley Drive, none of which show evidence of updating.

Notable gaps

Confidence notes

CategorySubject property SUBJECT
appraiser inspection photos
916 Caney Valley Drive
MLS # 24035242
493 AR-287 Highway
MLS # 25023879
1225 Stony Point Road
MLS # 25026040
104 Cove Chapel Road
MLS # 25028591
6907 Hwy 9
MLS # 25030617
10 Hammond Drive
MLS # 26006788
Q/C impression
beta
MEDIUM Q4 / C3K: updatedB: remodeledMEDIUM Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not observedHIGH Q4 / C2K: updatedB: updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C2K: not updatedB: not updatedMEDIUM Q5 / C3K: not updatedB: not updatedMEDIUM Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not updatedHIGH Q3-to-Q4 / C3K: not updatedB: not updated
Vs. subject
beta
โ€”Q similarC inferior
Both are anchored at the same stock manufactured-home quality tier, but this comparable's kitchen is not updated and baths were not even observable, versus the subject's updated kitchen and remodeled primary bath; the directional call is softened somewhat by this comp's sparse interior photo coverage.
Q similarC superior
Same manufactured-home quality tier as the subject, but this comparable is new (2024) construction described as pristine with an updated kitchen and updated baths throughout, presenting fresher than the subject's updated-but-not-new finishes.
Q similarC superior
Quality tier matches the subject, but this comparable is near-new (2022) construction shown vacant/staged with no visible wear anywhere, edging out the subject's condition despite its kitchen/baths being original rather than remodeled.
Q inferiorC similar
This comparable reads as more plain/economy-grade (minimal ornamentation) versus the subject's stock-but-more-finished interior, while condition levels are comparable since neither the comp's original kitchen/baths nor the subject's post-construction updates create a large gap in overall upkeep.
Q similarC similar
Same manufactured-home quality tier as the subject; condition is comparable overall, though the subject's updated kitchen and remodeled primary bath give it a slight edge over this comparable's original, un-updated finishes.
Q superiorC similar
This comparable's modular construction includes upgraded specifications (2x6 walls, granite counters, crown molding, tiled shower) that place it a notch above the subject's more basic stock finish package, while overall condition is closely matched since both present as well-maintained without major wear.
Detached outbuildings

Detached carport (open-sided, metal roof, gravel pad)

Small detached shed in rear yard/field

Large insulated metal shop building with two roll-up garage doors, man door, and concrete floor

Open-sided lean-to/covered bay attached to the shop building

Dark rectangular canopy/tent-like structure adjacent to the home

Long, low building visible in the distance beyond the rear fence line

Red-roofed barn/pavilion-style structure visible in aerial photos

โ€”

24x30 detached shop with electricity

Attached open-sided lean-to/carport with wire-fenced kennel enclosure on shop building

Additional small shed(s) near shop/house or in pasture

Detached metal building combining an open carport bay and an enclosed shop/storage room with garage door and window

Photo-only findings

Attached wood deck at rear of home

โ€”

Built wood deck with railing and stairs at rear entrance

โ€”โ€”โ€”

Whirlpool/jetted soaking tub built into an arched tile niche in the primary bathroom, separate from the walk-in shower

Pools & site improvementsโ€”โ€”

Fenced dog pen/enclosure

Pond visible near property in aerial photos

Stacked natural-stone retaining walls around home site

Metal livestock gate and low platform/bench structure visible in pasture area

Farm pond

โ€”
Site & view

Pond/water feature on the property

Open rural acreage surrounding dwelling

14.90 acres of open pasture with livestock/horse allowance

2.00-acre rural home site

Open rural/pastoral rear and side views

4.21-acre parcel โ€” excess/usable acreage for the area

Distant view of the Arkansas River and river-bottom farmland ('River/Lake Area')

Elevated, wooded, private homesite setting

6+/- acre rural parcel

Creek frontage (Cedar Creek)

Mixed wooded/pasture/rural land use

5.93 acres with highway frontage

Approximately 6.04 acres of open and wooded rural acreage

Stocked pond on/adjacent to the property

Sloped/down-sloping wooded rural lot with corner-lot configuration

Dated renovationsโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Review required

Ownership/boundary status of the shed visible in Photo 2 background should be confirmed against a plat or survey.

No photos document the foundation/crawlspace, roof surface, or mechanical systems โ€” appraiser should verify these areas were inspected.

Parcel boundaries relative to the pond and open land shown in Photos 3โ€“4 should be confirmed against legal description/plat.

No bathroom photos - baths condition/quality cannot be verified and should be confirmed via other means before finalizing adjustments.

Open-sided lean-to structure attached to the shop (Photo 4) should be verified in the field for size/use, as it is not clearly itemized in remarks or structured data.

A pond visible in the aerial photo (Photo 5) appears to sit outside the marked property boundary on a neighboring parcel; confirm this is not part of the subject site before use.

Verify whether the dark canopy/tent structure near the home (Photo 18) is a permanent outbuilding or a temporary/portable canopy.

Confirm property boundary relative to the long light-colored building visible over the fence line in Photo 1 and Photo 18 โ€” may belong to an adjacent parcel.

Confirm extent and construction of the 'dedicated dog pen' referenced in public remarks relative to the fencing visible in Photo 2, 3, and 18.

Confirm presence/condition of the third full bathroom (Jack-and-Jill) not clearly shown in the photo set.

Foundation type contradiction: structured data lists Crawl Space while remarks state a poured concrete foundation โ€” verify actual foundation type, which can affect condition/quality and cost approach.

Aerial photos (1, 6, 8, 41, 42, 45) show a red-roofed barn/pavilion and a pond near the property; the drawn parcel boundary in Photos 1, 3, 6, and 7 appears to exclude these from the subject's 4.21-acre tract โ€” confirm these belong to a neighboring parcel and are not shared/subject improvements.

Crawl space/underside of home is not visible in any photo; cannot confirm foundation condition, skirting integrity, or presence of any moisture issues below the structure.

Exterior siding and roof condition could not be fully verified due to backlighting/shadow in the only two exterior photos provided

Ownership/location of the gate and platform structure visible in photo 23 is ambiguous (may be pasture fencing on subject site or a neighboring feature) and warrants field verification

No crawl space or foundation-level photos were provided to verify condition given Crawl Space foundation type

Farm pond visible in aerial photos is not referenced in remarks or structured fields โ€” verify size, permanence, and whether it contributes site value or presents a liability/attractive-nuisance consideration.

Additional small shed(s) visible in aerial photos beyond the stated 24x30 shop are not itemized โ€” confirm count, size, and condition, as they may affect site improvement value.

Attached lean-to/kennel structure on the shop building is not documented in remarks โ€” confirm construction quality and whether it adds usable value.

Standing water visible extending toward the tree line in several pond photos (e.g., Photo 34) โ€” recommend confirming whether this reflects normal pond level or seasonal flooding/drainage concerns near the dwelling

Exact dimensions/construction quality of the detached carport/shop structure could not be determined from photos and are not stated in structured fields

Kitchen and bath finishes (granite, tile, whirlpool tub) appear to be original to the 2016 construction rather than later updates; recommend confirming with listing agent whether any interim renovations occurred

Contradictionsโ€”โ€”โ€”

Structured FOUNDATION field lists 'Crawl Space,' while Public Remarks state 'Concrete foundation, metal skirting' โ€” foundation type is inconsistent between the two sources.

โ€”โ€”โ€”

โ† all jobs